Eli Roth Confirms He Used AI in Horror Film Ice Cream Man After Initial Denial
The director clarified that generative AI was used in a small portion of scenes after fans spotted an AI visual effects company in the film's credits.
Eli Roth confirmed he used generative AI in his new horror film Ice Cream Man after initially telling press that he drew the animation sequences himself. The admission came after fans noticed AI visual effects company Dark Half listed in the credits of early review copies.
The controversy centers on a scene featuring Fleischer Studios style animation. Roth originally told Polygon that he drew the frames himself and worked with animators to make them more fluid. That explanation turned out to be incomplete at best.
Confronted with the Dark Half credit, Roth issued a new statement to Polygon. The director said AI was used in a very small portion of a few scenes in the film. He framed it as an opportunity where technology and creativity came together to help bring his vision to life.
Critics Say the AI Use Is Obvious
According to critics who have seen Ice Cream Man, the AI use appears more frequently than Roth's statement suggests. Multiple reviewers noted that the generative AI effects are extremely obvious and look like crap.
The revelation has landed poorly with horror fans. The genre's audience tends to prefer practical effects and has a well documented distaste for even traditional CGI blood made by VFX artists. The use of AI generated imagery represents an even harder sell to that crowd.
Ice Cream Man is a remake of a schlocky horror film that originally starred Clint Howard. Roth spent 20 years developing the project, according to an interview with Manny the Movie Guy.
Reviews Suggest Bigger Problems Than Just AI
The AI controversy may be the least of the film's problems based on early critical response. The reviews have been brutal, with some critics noting that their writeups are more entertaining than the movie itself.
Critics gave Ice Cream Man one star. The review said the whole thing is made with the swaggering confidence of someone whose friends laugh at his every joke and the haphazard efficiency of someone who needs to get product to the marketplace for strategic Q3 growth.
IGN wrote that the film is cheap rather than clever, cumbersome rather than campy, and ultimately just oddly empty. Slant Magazine took aim at the director's attempt at social commentary, saying his stab at building out the story has all the consistency of soft serve.
The Practical Effects Filmmaker Goes Digital
The AI admission marks an odd turn for a director who has long positioned himself as a champion of practical horror effects. Roth built his reputation on visceral, hands on gore work in films throughout his career.
That history makes the generative AI choice particularly surprising. It also explains why the revelation has drawn such a sharp response from fans who expected Roth to understand their values around craftsmanship in horror filmmaking.
Roth must have been aware of his core audience's contempt for AI and its creep into the horror genre. Horror fans have consistently rejected shortcuts that undermine the tangible quality that defines effective scary movies.
/ More from FirstDrop
Horror NewsObsession Becomes Sixth Highest-Grossing Horror Film of All Time
Curry Barker's indie supernatural horror made on a $750,000 budget has earned $443.3 million worldwide, surpassing Th…
Horror NewsZach Cregger's Resident Evil Movie Finally Confirms Raccoon City Connection
The new trailer reveals the survival horror film takes place parallel to Resident Evil 2, as a medical courier makes …